Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-05-27 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8682 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-04-30T11:32:45Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
rust	patch	`2026-04-13` → `2026-05-27`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 11am"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-04-30T11:32:49Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 27, 2026 8:04am

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 27, 2026 8:04am
petrinaut	Skipped	Comment	May 27, 2026 8:04am

cursor · 2026-04-30T11:32:52Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Toolchain and style/syntax alignment only; no intentional behavior or API changes beyond compiler compatibility.

Overview
Bumps the workspace Rust toolchain from nightly-2026-04-13 to nightly-2026-05-27 and applies follow-on fixes so the repo still builds and satisfies updated Clippy.

Most edits are mechanical: impl const → const impl for trait implementations across HashQL (diagnostics, MIR, core IDs), pub const fn on simple accessors (graph slices, MIR terminators, bit matrices), and std::io → core::io where crates use alloc/no_std paths, gated with the core_io feature on harpc, compiletest, repo-chores, and eval tests. HaRPC wire codec buffer I/O and compiletest harness/tests move Cursor/ErrorKind to core accordingly.

Smaller cleanups include debug_assert_eq! in symbol repr, dropping a redundant & in property-type error attachments and bench upload paths, {out_dir} in a build script eprintln!, and workspace Clippy allow entries for inline_modules and inline_trait_bounds. error-stack crate docs/badges reflect the new nightly pin.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit aea312b. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-04-30T11:33:48Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the repo Rust toolchain to nightly-2026-04-27 (from nightly-2026-04-13).

Changes: Aligns rust-toolchain.toml and the error-stack Rust version badges/documentation headers to reference the new nightly snapshot.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

TimDiekmann

Should finally fix the bug about incremental compilation.

codecov · 2026-04-30T11:37:39Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.04%. Comparing base (eff686d) to head (aea312b).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/hashql/core/src/graph/linked.rs	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/body/terminator/mod.rs	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8682   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.04%   59.04%           
=======================================
  Files        1340     1340           
  Lines      129323   129321    -2     
  Branches     5839     5839           
=======================================
- Hits        76360    76359    -1     
+ Misses      52062    52061    -1     
  Partials      901      901

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.18% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.75% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`79.32% <80.00%> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <100.00%> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.77% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`86.80% <85.71%> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-04-30T11:42:42Z

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 11.68%

⚠️

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 5 (👁 5) regressed benchmarks
✅ 74 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
👁	`pattern_match_constant`	209.2 ns	180 ns	+16.2%
👁	`bit_matrix/dense/transitive_closure[16]`	4.8 µs	6 µs	-19.21%
👁	`bit_matrix/dense/transitive_closure[200]`	754.4 µs	907.1 µs	-16.83%
👁	`bit_matrix/dense/transitive_closure[64]`	56.4 µs	71 µs	-20.53%
👁	`bit_matrix/sparse/union_rows[200]`	12.1 µs	13.8 µs	-12.94%
👁	`bit_matrix/sparse/union_rows[64]`	3.9 µs	4.5 µs	-12.16%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing deps/rs/rust-toolchains (aea312b) with main (eff686d)}

TimDiekmann · 2026-04-30T12:09:08Z

@copilot fix the linting issues

Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/hashintel/hash/sessions/ef84b90d-bb07-4ff6-a47f-52ffd18f8e37 Co-authored-by: TimDiekmann <21277928+TimDiekmann@users.noreply.github.com>

CLAassistant · 2026-04-30T12:18:29Z

All committers have signed the CLA.

Copilot · 2026-04-30T12:18:53Z

@copilot fix the linting issues

Fixed in commit 2f0d2b8. The changes address 4 clippy warnings introduced by the new nightly:

clippy::missing_const_for_fn: Added const to targets, targets_mut, and values in hashql/mir/src/body/terminator/switch_int.rs, and to as_slice in hashql/diagnostics/src/diagnostic/label.rs
clippy::std_instead_of_core: Changed std::io::ErrorKind to core::io::ErrorKind in harpc/net/src/session/server/test.rs and repo-chores/rust/src/sync_turborepo/mod.rs

See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/25164909600

TimDiekmann · 2026-04-30T12:31:07Z

Copilot missed half of the stuff, great. Very useful.

hash-worker · 2026-05-04T05:21:31Z

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

indietyp · 2026-05-27T07:39:41Z

Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-05-27 #8682 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/26497755528

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2706a3d. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-05-27T09:25:33Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.970 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.989 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.817 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$81.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 378 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.612 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$52.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$424 \mathrm{ms} \pm 971 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$90.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 461 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$287 \mathrm{ms} \pm 680 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.940 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.828 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 548 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$98.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$99.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 463 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 487 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 592 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$151 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 614 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$554 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.31 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-04-27

4651381

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge April 30, 2026 11:32

github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) labels Apr 30, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens April 30, 2026 11:35 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 30, 2026 11:36 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 30, 2026 11:45 View deployment

Copilot started work on behalf of TimDiekmann April 30, 2026 12:09 View session

Fix clippy linting issues in nightly-2026-04-27

1522b05

Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/hashintel/hash/sessions/ef84b90d-bb07-4ff6-a47f-52ffd18f8e37 Co-authored-by: TimDiekmann <21277928+TimDiekmann@users.noreply.github.com>

auto-merge was automatically disabled April 30, 2026 12:18
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 30, 2026 12:18 Inactive

Copilot finished work on behalf of TimDiekmann April 30, 2026 12:19

Copilot AI requested a review from TimDiekmann April 30, 2026 12:19

TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge April 30, 2026 12:21

github-actions Bot added the type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team label Apr 30, 2026

TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 30, 2026 12:24 View deployment

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/harpc/net/src/session/server/test.rs Fixed

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/repo-chores/rust/src/sync_turborepo/mod.rs Fixed

Comment thread libs/@local/repo-chores/rust/src/sync_turborepo/mod.rs Fixed

indietyp previously approved these changes Apr 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

indietyp added 2 commits May 27, 2026 09:28

fix: checkpoint

6471f00

fix: new lints

2706a3d

indietyp force-pushed the deps/rs/rust-toolchains branch from 2f0d2b8 to 2706a3d Compare May 27, 2026 07:39

github-actions Bot added the area/tests New or updated tests label May 27, 2026

indietyp changed the title ~~Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-04-27~~ Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-05-27 May 27, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 27, 2026 07:41 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 27, 2026 07:44 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed May 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/codec/src/serde/mod.rs Outdated

chore: fmt

aea312b

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 27, 2026 07:52 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 27, 2026 08:04 View deployment

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited by indietyp Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 11.68%

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

CLAassistant commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

hash-worker Bot commented May 4, 2026

Edited/Blocked Notification

Uh oh!

indietyp commented May 27, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 27, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited by indietyp

Loading

vercel Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading

CLAassistant commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading